Case file / Wage suppression
Uber
Algorithmic wage discrimination
Scholars and litigation allege Uber's driver-pay algorithm makes individualised offers based on each driver's data, so the same trip is offered to different drivers at different rates, suppressing wages for those whose data suggests they will accept less.
Status: Multi-jurisdictional litigation; UK Supreme Court ruled against Uber (2021)
The alleged harm
- /Drivers paid less than a non-personalised system would yield
- /Hits new, financially constrained, and lower-income-area drivers hardest
- /UK Supreme Court (2021): drivers are workers owed minimum wage
On the record
| Uber BV v. Aslam (UK Supreme Court) | [2021] UKSC 5 | 19 Feb 2021 |
| Veena Dubal, 'algorithmic wage discrimination' | peer-reviewed scholarship | 2023 |
This page reports on matters of public record. Claims described in those matters are allegations unless resolved by a court. Corrections and right of reply: hello@spspyrou.com.